- Retirement income, including annuities
- Lifetime mortgages/equity release
- Retirement financial advice
- Care
- Protection
Britain’s Retirement Happiness Hotspots: Amersham and Chesham crowned best place to retire
L&G has researched Britain’s happiest retirement hotspots and ranked them according to factors that are important to people retiring.
30 Jul 2025
Full press release

- L&G reveals the best areas for retirement wellbeing in Britain; with leafy Amersham and Chesham taking the top spot.
- The ranking scored 632 areas across a range of factors that make up a happier later life including access to healthcare, opportunities to build social connections, access to nature, local amenities and financial security.
- Mid Dunbartonshire (East Dunbartonshire) and Monmouthshire (Gwent) take the top spots as the best places to retire in Scotland and Wales respectively.
New analysis1 from L&G’s Retail business has revealed Britain’s top spots for retirement wellbeing - and rather than a coastal haven, the commuter belt constituency of Amersham and Chesham has ranked highest out of 632 areas across the nation.
The comprehensive study ranked every British constituency against six core pillars which measure good quality of later life: housing, health, community, finances, nature, and access to amenities. As a fulfilling and rewarding retirement is not defined by one factor alone, these pillars were rated and combined for a more holistic and complete picture of later life wellbeing. Each area was scored out of 100 to identify where retirees are most likely to thrive.
Buckinghamshire, Surrey, and West Sussex topped the retirement rankings, with constituencies such as Beaconsfield, Dorking and Horley, Godalming and Ash, and Mid Sussex placing high.
Lorna Shah, Managing Director, Retail Retirement, L&G: “This research gives us a more complete picture of what shapes a happy later life. It’s not just about one factor - it’s the combination of health, social connections, environment, and financial security that all play a part in retirement wellbeing.“Financial security in particular, is an enabler for many of the other measures, giving people the freedom to choose where and how they want to live in later life. Our research has shown that having enough set aside can greatly improve retirement wellbeing and a guaranteed income, through products such as an annuity, can lessen anxiety and create a greater sense of certainty. It’s the difference between simply getting by and really enjoying this next stage of life.”
Mid Dunbartonshire (East Dunbartonshire) and Monmouthshire (Gwent) took the top spots as the best places to retire in Scotland and Wales respectively.
While much of London performed poorly in terms of financial security in later life, the capital scored well for access to amenities nudging some constituencies up the league table. Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner made the top 20 coming in at 14th overall.
The pillars explained
The top scorer: Chesham and Amersham
Set in Buckinghamshire’s leafy Chiltern Hills, the market towns of Chesham and Amersham took the no. 1 spot, scoring 74 out of 100 overall, making it the best place to retire. It performs exceptionally well on health, with a score of 93, reflecting a strong proportion of over 65s in good physical and mental health, as well as good access to GPs. It also scores highly on financial security (78), and across the other remaining pillars: nature (72), social and community (69), housing (66), and local amenities (64), making it a well-rounded environment for later life.
Money has strong implications for later life wellbeing
The financial pillar, which covers pension income, cost of living, housing affordability and deprivation levels have a significant effect on later life wellbeing. Sheffield Hallam (South Yorkshire), West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine (Aberdeenshire), and Tatton (Cheshire), were all top performers in this area.
A previous study from L&G and the world-leading Happiness Research Institute2, an independent Danish think tank focusing on wellbeing, happiness and quality of life, found that the happiest retirees have an average monthly income of £1,700, but only 38% of retirees receive this or more, while many live on much less.
The stability of that income was also a factor. Retirees with a guaranteed income report higher levels of satisfaction and face fewer affordability challenges. Annuity-holders, for instance, are more likely to report lower levels of stress (51%) and the highest level of financial confidence (24% versus 21%) compared to those without one.
Later life happiness is also impacted by good health outcomes and strong social connections
Other elements also had an impact on the final rankings. England’s South West performed well in relation to housing which considered factors such as access to residential care homes and the availability of suitable senior housing in the region. Bristol Central (Bristol), Gloucester (Gloucestershire), and Bournemouth East (Dorset) all came out top for suitable housing for those in retirement.
Health is also considered a key factor to measure retirement wellbeing as poor health outcomes can derail later life happiness. Chesham and Amersham (Buckinghamshire), Winchester (Hampshire), and Beaconsfield (Buckinghamshire) were the top performers in this area, illustrating strong health outcomes for those in the area. The health pillar explored considerations such as the percentage of over 65s in good and bad health, access to GPs and dentists, and NHS waiting times.
Moreover, a sense of community is particularly important for later life wellbeing, with isolated adults much more likely to be less happy in retirement. Lancashire’s Fylde was the top performer in terms of social and community connection, followed by Lowestoft in Suffolk and Dorking and Horley in Surrey. This pillar considered the number of adults in the area aged 65 and over, life satisfaction levels, reported levels of happiness, and distance to the nearest station.
England’s East excelled when ranked according to the nature pillar with Castle Point (Essex), South Holland and The Deepings (Lincolnshire), and South Cambridgeshire (Cambridgeshire), making the top three. This pillar, which can impact wellbeing, accounted for air quality, reported summer days, percentage of addresses with private outdoor space, and the average size of private outdoor space.
London constituencies reserved the top spots when assessed against the amenities pillar with Cities of London and Westminster, Holborn and St Pancras, and Islington South and Finsbury, all making the top three. Wales and Scotland also made the top five with Dwyfor Meirionnydd (Wales, Gwynedd) and Glasgow East taking fourth and fifth spots respectively. This pillar considered access to chemists, supermarkets, post offices, banks, libraries, and theatres, among other amenities.
You can find the complete data set for each pillar, and our interactive heatmap, here
Overall best areas to retire in Britain
Overall best areas to retire in Scotland
Overall best areas to retire in Wales
References:
1Analyses were conducted by Opinium Research:
Methodology
The L&G Britain’s Happiness Hotspots Index is built around six core pillars: housing, health, social and community, financial, nature, and local amenities.
These pillars are made up of 27 individual indicators, combined to provide a comprehensive measure of how well each area supports quality of life in later years. A high score indicates a strong environment for ageing well—one that supports physical, emotional, and social wellbeing—while a low score signals areas that may need attention or investment.
For the purposes of this analysis, the index is based on the 632 parliamentary constituencies in Great Britain. Constituencies were selected as the unit of geography because they are politically relevant, statistically robust, and socially recognisable. With populations typically between 80,000 and 90,000, they offer a balance between data availability and local identity, making them ideal for identifying place-based strengths and challenges related to ageing.
In some cases, certain indicators reflect very similar aspects of life. To avoid double counting and to keep the index balanced, these are grouped into sub-pillars before being rolled up into the main pillars.
Weighting
The components of the index are weighted to reflect their relevance to older people's preferences. Specifically, each indicator is weighted based on how strongly it correlates with the internal migration of people aged 65 and over. Or in other words, the likelihood of older adults moving to an area, according to migration statistics.
Indicators that show a strong positive correlation with older people choosing to move to an area are weighted more heavily, while those with weaker correlations are down weighted to reflect their lesser influence. This approach also applies at the pillar level.
2Analyses were conducted by the Happiness Research Institute on a population-weighted sample of 3,000 UK retirees that responded to a cross-sectional online survey conducted by Opinium in April 2024. The happiest retirees were defined as those with a life satisfaction score greater than the sample median.
Further information
